Evaluating the Effect of Modelling Methods and Landslide Inventories Used for Statistical Susceptibility Modelling

Autor(en)
Stefan Steger, Rainer Bell, Helene Petschko, Thomas Glade
Abstrakt

Landslide susceptibility maps can be elaborated using a variety of methodological approaches. This study investigates quantitative and qualitative differences between two statistical modelling methods, taking into account the impact of two different response variables (landslide inventories) for the Rhenodanubian Flysch zone of Lower Austria. Quantitative validation of the four generated susceptibility maps is conducted by calculating conventional accuracy statistics for an independent random landslide subsample. Qualitative geomorphic plausibility is estimated by comparing the final susceptibility maps with hillshades of a high resolution Airborne Laser Scan Digital Terrain Model (ALS-DTM). Spatial variations between the final susceptibility maps are displayed by difference maps and their densities. Although statistical quality criterions reveal similar qualities for all maps, difference maps and geomorphic plausibility expose considerable differences between the maps. Given that, this conclusion could only be drawn by evaluating additionally the geomorphic plausibility and difference maps. Therefore, we indicate that conventional statistical quality assessment should be combined with qualitative validation of the maps. . © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015.

Organisation(en)
Institut für Geographie und Regionalforschung
Seiten
201-204
Anzahl der Seiten
4
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09057-3_27
Publikationsdatum
2014
Peer-reviewed
Ja
ÖFOS 2012
507015 Regionalforschung
Schlagwörter
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
Allgemeine Umweltwissenschaft, Allgemeine Erdkunde und Planetologie
Link zum Portal
https://ucrisportal.univie.ac.at/de/publications/e5739f85-6380-4ecb-9dfc-482a7fe4d1fe