Another perspective on the Peters projection controversy
- Author(s)
- Florian Hruby
- Abstract
Today, we can choose between approximately 250 map projections. However, cartographic practice is dominated by just a few of them, and constant discussion is held on the most suitable way of mapping the world. In this paper, we will approach this discussion via the Peters projection controversy. A review of this controversy will allow us to highlight several shortcomings inherent to the current discourse on world maps and globes by mainstream cartography, among them a lack of empirical research. Drawing upon evidence from cartographic history, I will show that main aspects for a comprehensive analysis were already considered by ancient mapmakers. I will also summarize different viewpoints empirical research can take on globes and maps. As we shall see from this discussion, designing a world map is not only an issue of projection. Also map edges and seamless visualization on a globe shape the user’s spatial mind.
- Organisation(s)
- Department of Geography and Regional Research
- External organisation(s)
- Mexiko City
- Journal
- Kartographische Nachrichten
- Volume
- 67
- Pages
- 68-73
- No. of pages
- 6
- ISSN
- 0022-9164
- Publication date
- 01-2017
- Peer reviewed
- Yes
- Austrian Fields of Science 2012
- 507004 History of geography, 507003 Geoinformatics, 105407 Cartography
- Keywords
- ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Earth and Planetary Sciences, Geography, Planning and Development
- Portal url
- https://ucrisportal.univie.ac.at/en/publications/68ec5167-1719-46bf-bfe4-915e81b5f57f